How Harvard Wants To Make Racism Legal Again

The truth could care less about your feeee-lings.  The truth about diversity is that diversity sucks.  Diversity does not make things more interesting.  It makes them more mediocre.  It dumbs them down by filling them full of under-qualified idiots who don't have the requisite ninja moves.  That all being said, a certain amount of diversity will accrue.  The real problems with diversity begin when it gets forced beyond that level of natural occurrence. 

When diversity is forced on a basis of race, it is supposedly done to combat the chimerical evils of !RACISM!  Racism is an academic term invented in order to criminalize Freedom of Association which excluded groups that desired access to the resources of another group.  When people attempt to mobilize the government to tap these resources without earning any right to so enjoy them; negative externalities occur. 

One common occurrence is that meritocracies naturally tend to exclude people who don't bust their asses hard enough to be of legitimate merit.  A current example of this is occurring at Harvard.  The stereotypical fear is that the Asian kids are working too hard, scoring too well, and horking-up all the prestige billets.  Or they would land all of those billets if Harvard didn't rise up to smite the Yellow Peril of well-raised teenagers who do the Hell out of their job. 

Reactions to this have been increased effort to the asymptotic point where
 ridiculous approaches infinity  The patience for this was predictably finite and the Asian kids grew pissed.  Pissed people frequently turn violent and smash things. 

Intelligent pissed people do something far more threatening.  They find the sleaziest, most vile attorney they can on the Internet and they hire the Son of a Bitch. The Asians getting denied a shot a Harvard are both intelligent and quite pissed. Harvard may well find itself in condign deep sh!t.

Asian-American student who was denied admission despite being valedictorian of a competitive high school, achieving a perfect ACT score and a perfect score of 800 on two of the SAT II subject exams, and participating in numerous extracurricular and volunteer activities. The applicant, the lawsuit states, was "denied the opportunity to compete for admission to Harvard on equal footing with other applicants" due to his race.

Harvard went in for the predictable academic buzz words.  It was all about the "Holistic Review" of each applicant as a box-chec...oops; I mean human being. 

Then and now, the college considers each applicant through an individualized, holistic review having the goal of creating a vibrant academic community that exposes students to a wide-range of differences: background, ideas, experiences, talents and aspirations," said Robert Iuliano, Harvard's general counsel, in a statement.

Which fundamentally brings into question why our tax monies should still go to colleges and universities.  Do we want our engineering schools to produce people who can design buildings, bridges and operating room software systems that don't crash under heavy use?  If so, we need to focus away from holistic crap and get some people with drive and ability into these classrooms.  Again, you get to choose between diversity and excellence.  I don't see any serious NBA fans boycotting until the Champion Golden State Warriors have a roster that "Looks More like Amerika." 

By the same token, if Asian kids are the ones showing up to Harvard and actually bothering to study; guess who deserves the degrees and academic honors?  This isn't frikking hard.  Humans are creatures driven by incentive.  You do what gets you paid.  You do what gets you laid.  If you want positive behavior like hard work and a sincere effort to acquire detailed logic on challenging topics, that sort of thing has to be awarded. 

To be frank here, diversity can only work when it strives towards an unambiguous, positive and very non-diverse standard of unrelenting excellence.  Let these Asian kids be an example.  Let there be a fair competition.  Harvard will no longer be Saigon On The Charles when White, Black and Hispanic kids get the message that they need to lay off the fap and do things aimed at personal self-development.  Harvard making racism legal again will only temporarily forestall the demotism and destruction of people who don't give a crap and just rely on affirmative action programs.

Loving Day - A Book Review

I may be obstinate, obtuse, obscurantist and !RAY-CIST! (Even if I say so myself).  To paraphrase an old Hip-Hop Tune, I got 99 problems...

Play my favorite country song backwards, and I get the wife, the kids, the huntin' dawg, and the double-wide back.  As a bonus, I'm no longer stoned on Gentleman Jack.  But one problem I don't have is figuring out who the heck I am.  I come in two colors - white and red.  The red typically shows up first and brightest above the collar of my shirt after I spend an afternoon handling the yard work.  For my problems, limitations, and shortcomings I am blessed.  I know them well and can deal with them with a certain resigned equipoise. I know exactly what God made me. 

In the novel Loving Day by Matt Johnson, we meet an anti-heroic protagonist named Warren Duffy who is far less lucky. This poor man is the offspring of diversity.  Dad was white, mom was black, the offspring was somewhat ambiguous.  He had run away from that background and now he was forced into facing it.  His wife, his previous sexual partners and his chosen avocation were all attempts to exit.  Then his wife divorces him, his comic shop fails and his dad dies and leaves him a total winner of an inheritance.  A partially burned, money pit of a house in the "troubled" Germantown neighborhood of Philly.  The guy has a hostile divorce, a toxic inheritance, from a sub-par dad and arrives home to meet...his illegitimate teenage daughter.  You could be more completely screwed.  If you were Xaviera Hollander.

White society has no truck with this man.  They put his books that he writes in the "Urban" section.  This is far more urbane and socially acceptable than Knee-Grow.  Pure black society is only marginally better.  They take him in begrudgingly.  They trust him as far as The British Army really trusted Benedict Arnold.  Other so-called mixed people refer to him as "Sunflower."  This is a term for a mixed-race person who is yellow on the outside and brown in the middle. 

This lack of identity causes everyone around him to pigeon-hole him in the least advantageous category they can.  Duffy fights against this.  He owns up to fathering a daughter as a teenager and tries to salvage her life before it becomes as big a dumpster fire as his own.  He even attempts to use this mess as a vehicle to figure just who in the hell he actually is.  I'll let you read the novel and figure out how Loving Day  comes into the story.

Johnson tells an exceptional story.  His ungodly screw up of a protagonist nukes everything in his path like the Chernobyl Reactor.  The initial thing that prevents you from hating The Lamentable Mr. Duffy as a villain is the fact that he is so utterly screwed up that he doesn't even understand how to get out his own way.  He is a man betrayed, embittered and abandoned by every person in his life he had any expectation of love and support from. 

The best he ever gets is tolerated.  It's as if a great, united rainbow coalition of black, mixed and even Caucasoid humanity have all reached a grand accord.  Namely an accord that reads "Warren Duffy ain't my Knee-Grow."  If I ever played a Half-Orc character in an AD&D game, Warren Duffy's attitude towards this mess would be a great role-playing shtick. 

Duffy's ultimate enlightenment seems to be that he is what he is and he's just got to suck it up and make a positive difference anyway.  It's a mature triumph of masculine humility and existential patience.  Not a lot of human beings could pull this off.  Duffy grows on you as he buckles his pith helmet and deals with his problems rather than running for Exit.

On a sociological level this novel is a Red Pill Chemotherapy course.  Everything that is wrong in this man's life can be at least partially traced back to 1st and 2nd order effects from Swirling.  His confused teenage sexuality, his abortion of a marriage and his bastard offspring that returns from his past like a bad acid flashback are all in some way the products of unsuccessful swirl relationships that blow up in his face like an improperly handled Claymore Mine.  Duffy is a Greek Hero condemned to torture by the hubris of casual interracial sex where neither partner really thinks through or plans for what they are getting into. 

Duffy becomes a metaphor.  Not the model biracial British Princess, but instead he is the discarded chaff.  A Post-Modern Miniver Cheevy who is cast loose in an urban wilderness.  I have an unpleasant feeling that a large majority of the mixed race children in Amerika are more Warren Duffy than Disney Princess.  How much easier it would be for him to succumb to his desires to burn the family house down, take the insurance cash and drink himself to enstupidation on some beach near Aruba. 

What percentage of the real-world people in Warren Duffy's shoes want to do the exact same thing?  I'm guessing it's pretty high.  What percentage of these people have that divine, protagonist spark of goodness that exists to keep me from putting this novel down?  I'm guessing that this number is pretty small.  The ratio of the strong and heroic to the weak and hurting suggests a very bad and negative mathematics to swirling. 

Matt Johnson tells a brilliant, funny and precautionary tale.  His empathy for Warren Duffy is infectious.  You feel that he deserves a certain justice for his fecklessness but that it should be leavened with the proper mercy that God offers to the sinner.  It is not all his fault.  But it is his responsibility.  When Warren Duffy mans up and eats the loses he gains something else.  He emerges from the chaotic swirl to be someone with a respectable masculine identity who is actually worth being.  Maybe that is an aspiration our confused and dying culture in the western world can actually aspire towards. 

Italy Rips Off The Mask of The Failed Elite

David Brooks noticed something and The New York Times even permitted him to.

Once upon a time, white male Protestants ruled the roost. You got into a fancy school if your father had gone to the fancy school. You got a job at a white-shoe law firm or climbed the corporate ladder if you golfed at the right club.  Then we smashed all that. We replaced a system based on birth with a fairer system based on talent. We opened up the universities and the workplace to Jews, women and minorities. University attendance surged, creating the most educated generation in history. We created a new boomer ethos, which was egalitarian (bluejeans everywhere!), socially conscious (recycling!) and deeply committed to ending bigotry.  You’d think all this would have made the U.S. the best governed nation in history. Instead, inequality rose. Faith in institutions plummeted. Social trust declined. The federal government became dysfunctional and society bitterly divided.

So then he has to explain why this all went in the opposite direction...

1. Exaggerated faith in intelligence.
2. Misplaced faith in autonomy.
3. Misplaced notion of the self.
4. Inability to think institutionally. 
5. Misplaced idolization of diversity.

So what is the end state of this.  Well, quite simply; a group of looters take over.  It ends like an overly verbose Ayn Rand novel, except that we never get to meet John Galt.  The looters pillaging Italy like a Carthaginian Army are ensconced in the EU Headquarters in Belgium. 

They claim to just love Democracy.  What they don't like are fickle voters who actually vote their own interests.  The European University system gives them an elite that they are all supposed to shut their yaps and follow.  They manage these people out of the goodness of their ever-loving hearts. 

Or not.  They run a Kakistocracy.  The recent Coup d'Etat in Italy shows us how Democratic Democracy really is.  You can always vote.  They just don't allow you to make certain choices and will pull the plug on you if you do.

Italian President Sergio Mattarella on Sunday barred a coalition of euroskeptic parties from forming a government despite a clear mandate handed down by voters earlier this spring. The move amounted to nothing less than a bloodless coup d’état and laid bare the naked contempt for the vox populi among the Italian and European liberal establishment. Talk about liberalism without democracy.

This brings us back around to David Brooks' root causes of elitist tyranny and failure.  If we apply an Alt-Right Translator to David's 5 Root Causes we get 3 fundamental flaws of Post-Enlightenment Western Democracy.

Exaggerated faith in intelligence combined with the inability to think institutionally translates into a Rejection of Traditional Aristocratic Hierarchy.  Brooks specially describes what the dope-smoking, jean-wearing, egalitarian campus rabble replaced.  These White Male Protestants who hived at the WASP-Nest Institutions were a Brahman Class.  They were privileged to be sure, but in return for that privilege they acted out of patriotism and noblesse oblige.

Misplaced faith in autonomy and a misplaced notion of the self map to a combination of toxic individualism merged with crowdism.  The individualism comes from the death of aristocracy.  You can't tell *me* what to do in an egalitarian society.  *I* don't have to take it from you.  *I* have rights and *you* have obligations. 

Then we get the crowd of identical individuals.  It's amazing how all these liberated individualistic units looked identical.  The Star Wars Clone Armies had more unique personalities.  These kindred non-spirits flock together and form a hostile, demanding, destructive crowd.  This is crowdism and it destroys anything or anybody that stands out above the norm. 

The misplaced idolization of diversity doesn't even need translation.  Now Brooks would never except the simple conclusion that diversity plus proximity equals conflict, but he does understand that we all need to stay the people God made us.  We need our society to work the way we built it. That cannot continue when we deliberately replace the population stock. 

So David tells us to look in the mirror honestly.  To accept our virtues as well.  Diversity Fetishism is dishonest self-hatred.  Here David Brooks is magnificently right.  God made me White and LeBron James Black for his own divine reasons.  Neither one of us has anything to feel guilty over on those grounds.  Ignore the Left.  It is #OKTOBeWhite.

It's also OK for average, working Italians to choose not to work for some anonymous German banking conglomerate.  They may like being Italian.  They might just get up in the morning, look in the mirror while shaving or brushing their teeth and feel pretty satisfied with what they see before them.  And what in the heck is a European anyway?  It has been meaningless ever since their failing, university-educated elite destroyed the morally binding concept of Christendom. 

Now they feel like they have to destroy what it is to be an Italian.  How long before the managerial state destroys what it is to be a human being?  It's a valid question now that the mask just got ripped off of the Italian "Democracy."  We now know it is nothing but a lie. 

The Edmund Winston Pettus Bridge To Nowhere

The Edmund Winston Pettus Bridge was once said to lead to the promised land if people just kept their eyes on the prize.

The Edmund Pettus bridge became a symbol of the momentous changes taking place in Alabama, America, and the world. It was here that voting rights marchers were violently confronted by law enforcement personnel on March 7, 1965. The day became known as Bloody Sunday.

I'll just cut straight to the scary, Alt-Right !#RACISM! here.  The current trajectory of The African American Community is unsustainable.  They will suffer increasing pain, humiliation, emiseration and will grow up to hate the way a black African under caste grew up hating the majority in both Zimbabwe and South Africa. Why the pessimistic disrespect?  Let's take a look at the people who run branches of the NAACP.  Rachel Nkechi Diallo Dolezal is a pretty accurate example.

Former Spokane Chapter NAACP President Rachel Dolezal is now facing legal trouble that could land her behind bars. KHQ has confirmed that Dolezal, who legally changed her name to Nkechi Diallo in 2016, is accused of 1st Degree Theft by Welfare Fraud, Perjury in the 2nd Degree, and False Verification for Public Assistance. Her potential punishment under RCW 74.08.331 could include up to 15 years in prison.  Because Dolezal changed her name, we’ll be referring to her as Nkechi Diallo. According to court documents, Diallo illegally received $8,747 in food assistance, and illegally received $100 in childcare assistance. Total restitution, according to the documents, is $8,847, allegedly stolen from August 2015 through November 2017.

Not only was she not really broke, she wasn't really Nkechi Diallo.  Furthermore, she was running an NAACP chapter while not really black. Absolutely nothing about this woman's life was ever genuine or honest.  So after people like MLK, Medgar Evers, and Malcolm X actually fought, bled and died to liberate African Americans from an under caste status; they are actually choosing leadership that is less genuinely Black than Senator Lieawatha is Cherokee. And it gets painted with another layer of bull feces.  These leaders are chosen and upheld by the likes of Shaun King. Yes, Malcolm X has been replaced with Talcum X.


Why has this become such a festering snake pit?  As I've stated above, African Americans didn't used to have to import leadership from outposts of the White Supremacy Hierarchy such as the Punahuo Academy in Hawaii.  Are the only African American leaders standing between us and the pitchforks really at least 50% White?  The political and intellectual leadership of the African American are increasingly less black than Mr. Plessey from The Great State of Louisiana.

Maybe YouTuber Simone56 had a point when she described the current African American community using the metaphor "Rome is Burning".  The successor movement to the Civil Rights Movement seems to be The Divestment Movement. Romantic (Swirling) Exit, Economic Exit, Ideological Exit and Physical Exit are now considered the new Civil Rights frontiers they sail for.  But the tragic truth here is that Malcolm X was magnificently right.  They can talk about divestment right up to the point where they attempt to literally jump out of their own skin.  You are what God made you.

This will never actually work.  Too much jealousy exists within their ranks.  This is why Tommy Sotomayor gets more hatred directed at him than obvious scam artists such as Talcum X.  This is why Rachel Dolezal is given a greater leadership role in their community than Candace Owens.  This is the ultimate result of Leftist Politics in a Demotic Society.  Black Americans have been destroyed by their politically correct, SJW "friends".